Legal Opinion
Rana v. Terdjanian
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided June 5, 2012No. AC 33428PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ROBINSON, J.
The defendant, Harry Terdjanian, appeals from the trial court’s judgment rendered in favor of the substitute plaintiff, Rana Automaster, LLC,1 for conversion, statutory theft and a violation of the Connecticut Unfair Trade Practices Act (CUTPA), General Statutes § 42-110a et seq., and from the court’s subsequent award of offer of judgment interest and attorney’s fees. The defendant claims that the court improperly (1) denied his motions to dismiss the action, (2) determined that the defendant had committed statutory theft under General Statutes § 52-664, (3) awarded the…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Ventres v. Goodspeed Airport, LLCSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
- Sturm v. Harb Development, LLCSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
- Association Resources, Inc. v. WallSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
- Baldwin Piano & Organ Co. v. BlakeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- Briggs v. McWeenySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Kosiorek v. SmigelskiConnecticut Appellate Court · 2012
- 3N International, Inc. v. Carrano (In re Carrano)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Connecticut · 2015
- Masse v. PerezConnecticut Appellate Court · 2012
- LM Ins. Corp. v. Connecticut Dismanteling, LLCConnecticut Appellate Court · 2017
- Benjamin v. City of NorwalkConnecticut Appellate Court · 2016
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.