Legal Opinion
Foote v. Commissioner of Correction
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided November 30, 2010No. AC 31008PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
DiPENTIMA, C. J.
The dispositive issue in this appeal is whether the petitioner’s continued silence after the expiration of the 120 day statutory deadline for the rendering of judgment effected a waiver of the requirement imposed by General Statutes § 51-183b. In his appeal from the denial of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus, the petitioner, Stanley Foote, claims that the habeas court abused its discretion when it denied his motion to set aside the judgment. We conclude that it did and, consequently, reverse the judgment of the habeas court and remand the case for a new trial.
The…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Connecticut Light & Power Co. v. CostleSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Collins v. YorkSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1970
- Franklin Credit Management Corp. v. NicholasConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
- Ippolito v. IppolitoConnecticut Appellate Court · 1992
- Borden v. Town of WestportSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1930
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Santos v. Zoning Board of AppealsConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013
- Fibre Optic Plus, Inc. v. XL Specialty InsuranceConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010
- Jacobson v. Zoning Board of AppealsConnecticut Appellate Court · 2012
- Anderson v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013
- Doyle Group v. Alaskans for CuddyConnecticut Appellate Court · 2016
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.