Statewide Grievance Committee v. Brown
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
LAVERY, C. J.
The defendant, Ridgely Whitmore Brown, appeals from the judgment of the trial court suspending him from the practice of law and ordering him to participate in fee arbitration. The defendant *185claims that (1) Practice Book § 2-37 (a) (6), which authorizes the plaintiff statewide grievance committee to order mandatory arbitration, is unconstitutional, (2) the court improperly found that he had waived the right to contest the constitutionality of § 2-37 (a) (6), (3) the court improperly denied his proposed arbitration order and granted that of the plaintiff and (4) the court…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Massameno v. Statewide Grievance CommitteeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Pinsky v. Statewide Grievance CommitteeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Statewide Grievance Committee v. RozbickiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Thalheim v. Town of GreenwichSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
- Statewide Grievance Committee v. EgbarinConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Town of Ridgefield v. Eppoliti Realty Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2002
- Suffield Development Associates Ltd. Partnership v. National Loan Investors, L.P.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2006
- Remax Right Choice v. AryehConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007
- State v. ROSS V.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2008
- Merryfield Animal Hospital v. MacKay, No. Cv 02-0464586 S (Jul. 31, 2002)Connecticut Superior Court · 2002
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.