Legal Opinion
Heyman Associates No. 1 v. Insurance Co. of Pennsylvania
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided January 17, 1995No. 14938PublishedCited by 158 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtKatz, J.
This appeal arises from a dispute over whether “absolute pollution” exclusions in the plaintiffs commercial liability policies with the defendants exclude coverage for damages caused by a fuel oil spill from the plaintiffs property into Stamford Harbor. The plaintiff, Heyman Associates No. 1, brought suit against the defendants, the Insurance Company of the State of Pennsylvania (ISOP) and National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania (National Union), after the defendants denied coverage based on the exclusions. Both the plaintiff and the defendants moved for summary…
2Cases cited68 opinions
- Hammer v. Lumberman's Mutual Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Hartford Insurance v. County of NassauNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
- Rowe v. GodouSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Aschenbrenner v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1934
- United States v. Standard Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by158 opinions
- National Union Fire Insurance Co. of Pittsburgh v. CBI Industries, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1995
- QSP, Inc. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
- Mazziotti v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- Hertz Corp. v. Federal InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- Buell Industries, Inc. v. Greater New York Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
153 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.