Legal Opinion
Bailey v. University of Minnesota
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided June 4, 1971No. 42731PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Nelson, Justice.
Upon defendants’ motion for judgment on the pleadings, the court below held that plaintiffs’ complaint for declaratory relief presented no justiciable controversy capable of judicial determination. An order for judgment in favor of defendants was entered August 26, 1970, and judgment was entered pursuant to such order on August 27,1970. Plaintiffs have appealed to this court from the judgment.
Upon the state of the record before us, the legal issues appear to be as follows: (1) Whether a declaratory judgment action brought by individuals against the University of Minnesota and…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State Ex Rel. University of Minnesota v. ChaseSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
- Fanning v. University of MinnesotaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
- State ex rel. Smith v. Van ReedSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
- Gleason v. University of MinnesotaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1908
- STATE EX. REL. SHOLES v. University of MinnesotaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1952
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- James Michael McCONNELL, Appellee, v. Elmer ANDERSON Et Al., AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1971
- Miller v. ChouSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Stephens v. Board of Regents of University of MinnesotaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2000
- Harford v. University of MinnesotaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993
- BD. OF REGENTS OF U OF M v. ReidCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.