Legal Opinion

Fanning v. University of Minnesota

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 17, 1931No. 28,247PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDibell, J.

Taxpayers’ suit to enjoin the defendants from erecting a dormitory on the campus of the University of Minnesota. There were findings and judgment for the defendants. The plaintiffs appeal from the judgment.

The status of the board of regents and of the university and their relation to the state were considered in State ex rel. University of Minnesota v. Chase, 175 Minn. 259, 220 N. W. 951, 954. The question arose upon a controversy between the board and the commission of administration and finance created by L. 1925, p. 756, c. 426, 1 Mason, 1927, c. 3A, a body appointed by the governor and…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. University of Minnesota v. ChaseSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
  2. Board of Regents of University of Michigan v. Auditor GeneralMichigan Supreme Court · 1911
  3. McClain v. Regents of the UniversityOregon Supreme Court · 1928
  4. State Board of Agriculture v. Auditor GeneralMichigan Supreme Court · 1923
  5. State ex rel. Black v. State Board of EducationIdaho Supreme Court · 1921

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Sego v. KirkpatrickNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1974
  2. State and Diver v. City of MiamiSupreme Court of Florida · 1933
  3. Baker v. CarterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
  4. Boswell v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
  5. Robertson v. ZimmermannNew York Court of Appeals · 1935

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API