Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. University of Minnesota v. Chase

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 27, 1928No. 26,800PublishedCited by 64 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.

Mandamus on behalf of the University of Minnesota and its Board of Regents to require Ray P. Chase, State Auditor, to approve a voucher and issue his warrant in payment of an item of expense incurred by the regents in a preliminary survey for the purpose of installing a plan of group insurance of members of the faculty and other permanent employes of the university. On the ground of policy alone, that purpose encountered the disapproval of the Commission of Administration and Finance; hence the adverse action of the auditor. Judgment went against him, and he appeals.

On the surface of things,…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Springer v. Government of Philippine IslandsSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  2. Fairbank v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
  3. Newell v. People Ex Rel. PhelpsNew York Court of Appeals · 1852
  4. Board of Regents of University of Michigan v. Auditor GeneralMichigan Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Weinberg v. Regents of UniversityMichigan Supreme Court · 1893

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by64 opinions

  1. University of Alaska v. National Aircraft Leasing, Ltd.Alaska Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Baker v. CarterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
  3. Boe v. FossSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Board of Regents of Higher Education v. JudgeMontana Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Fanning v. University of MinnesotaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931

59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API