Legal Opinion
BD. OF REGENTS OF U OF M v. Reid
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided September 30, 1994No. C6-93-2397PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ANDERSON, Judge.
The district court denied a motion for summary judgment by appellants Board of Regents of the University of Minnesota, Tony Potami, Mark Rotenberg, Ettore Infante, and Patrick Spellacy on claims against them for defamation, misrepresentation, and violation of the Minnesota Data Practices Act. We reverse and remand.
FACTS
Respondent Kenneth J. Reid, a tenured professor, was head of the University Mineral Resources Research Center (MRRC) from 1977 until it closed in 1991. At Reid’s suggestion, respondent Jozef K. Tylko became a visiting professor with the MRRC in 1978.
In…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Thiele v. StichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Nieting v. BlondellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
- State Ex Rel. University of Minnesota v. ChaseSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
- Johnson v. DirkswagerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- Hanks v. Hubbard Broadcasting, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Buchanan v. Minnesota State Department of HealthCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1998
- Tatro v. University of MinnesotaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2011
- Michael Harlow v. State of Minnesota Department of Human ServicesCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2015
- Redwood County Telephone Co. v. LuttmanCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1997
- Brenny v. Board of Regents of the University of MinnesotaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2012
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.