Legal Opinion

Application of Bisley

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided May 28, 1952No. Patent Appeal 5876PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHNSON, Judge.

This is an appeal from the decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office rejecting as unpatentable over the prior art claims 4,14, 19, 20, 23, 25, 35, 36 and 39 of appellant’s application for a patent on improvements in a “Household Food Mixer.” Seventeen claims (claims 5, 10, 11, 21, 24, 26 through 34, 37, 38 and 40) have been allowed.

The appealed claims relate to various features of an electric food mixer of the generally familiar type commonly used in household kitchens and sold in most electrical appliance stores. The mixer has a base which supports a…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. Ray-O-Vac Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. Application of LindbergCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1952
  3. Application of OsplackCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1952
  4. In re DeLanceyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1947
  5. Application of RichardsCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1951

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Application of Philip A. Shaffer, JrCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1956
  2. Application of McKennaCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1953
  3. Application of WorrestCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1953
  4. Application of SchechterCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1953
  5. Application of O'KeefeCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1953

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API