Legal Opinion
Application of O'Keefe
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Decided March 11, 1953No. Patent Appeals 5940PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
O’CONNELL, Judge.
This is an appeal from the decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office affirming the action of the Primary Examiner in finally rejecting claims 15 through 20 of appellant’s application for a patent on an alleged invention which relates particularly, to features of stove construction that can be incorporated advantageously in modern cooking stoves or ranges such as are commonly termed console type stoves.
No claims were allowed and all of them were rejected on two independent grounds; namely, (1) as unpatentable over the disclosure of the patent of Maul,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Eibel Process Co. v. Minnesota & Ontario Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. Ray-O-Vac Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Application of BisleyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1952
- International Standard Electric Corp. v. KingslandCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1948
- In re DeLanceyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1947
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- De Burgh v. KINDEL FURNITURE COMPANYDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1954
- Joseph Bancroft & Sons Co. v. Brewster Finishing Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1953
- Application of CarterCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1954
- Bourns v. Edcliff InstrumentsDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1954
- Lyons v. Construction Specialties, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1953
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.