Legal Opinion
Application of Worrest
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Decided February 6, 1953No. Patent Appeal 5908PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JOHNSON, Judge.
This is an appeal from the decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office affirming the Primary Examiner’s rejection of claims 1-12, inclusive, all the claims in appellant’s application for “Apparatus for and Method of Dealing with Newly Molded Glassware.”
The appealed claims relate to a method and apparatus for cooling or otherwise similarly treating newly formed glassware immediately after removal from the mold of a glass making machine, prior to conveyance to a heat treating apparatus such as a lehr. In particular, appellant discloses an apparatus and…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Lincoln Engineering Co. v. Stewart-Warner Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Funk Bros. Seed Co. v. Kalo Inoculant Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Kirsch Mfg. Co. v. Gould Mersereau Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1925
- Application of BisleyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1952
- Sachs v. Hartford Electric Supply Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1931
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Autogiro Company of America v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967
- Application of McKennaCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1953
- In re ReuterCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1981
- Charles T. Samuelson v. Bethlehem Steel Company. Bethlehem Steel Company v. Charles T. SamuelsonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1963
- In re ReuterCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1981
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.