Legal Opinion

Application of Schechter

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided June 3, 1953No. Patent Appeal 5935PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHNSON, Judge.

This is an appeal from the decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office affirming the action of the Primary Examiner in finally rejecting claims 17, 19, 20, 21, 23, 46, 47 and 48 of appellants’ application, serial No. 75,282, for a patent on "Synthesis of 4-Hydroxy-2-Cyclopenten-l-Ones.” All appealed claims are product claims. Twelve method claims and one product claim, claim 18, were allowed by the examiner.

Claims 19, 20, 21 and 23 have been rejected as drawn to non-elected species and that rejection is not challenged by appellants. Accordingly, those…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Application of McKennaCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1953
  2. In Re HassCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1944
  3. Application of BisleyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1952
  4. In Re KaufmannCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1951
  5. Parker v. MarzallDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1950

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Application of Viktor PapeschCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1963
  2. Federal Trade Commission v. AbbVie IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2020
  3. Application of Arthur D. Lohr and Harold M. SpurlinCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1963
  4. Application of Joseph R. Riden, Jr., and James P. FlavinCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1963
  5. Application of Herman HoeksemaCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1968

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API