Application of Richards
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
JOHNSON, Judge.
One claim of appellant's application for a patent for a compensating pattern control device for a shotgun was allowed by the Primary Examiner, but four were rejected as unpatentable over the prior art, the Board of Appeals affirming the rejection. The appellant filed a Petition for Reconsideration which was denied by the board, and from these decisions appellant has appealed to this court. R.S. 4911, 35 U.S.C.A. § 59a.
The invention resides in what appellant alleges is the first combination of a continuously variable shotgun pattern control device with a compensator or recoil…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- In re HenschellCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1937
- In re LaneCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1948
- In re MolyneauxCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1929
3Cited by9 opinions
- Application of BisleyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1952
- Application of LindbergCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1952
- Application of Leslie E. SoderquistCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1964
- Application of HallCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1953
- Winslow Manufacturing Co. v. Peerless Gauge Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1958
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.