Legal Opinion

Application of Richards

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided February 27, 1951No. Patent Appeals 5726PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHNSON, Judge.

One claim of appellant's application for a patent for a compensating pattern control device for a shotgun was allowed by the Primary Examiner, but four were rejected as unpatentable over the prior art, the Board of Appeals affirming the rejection. The appellant filed a Petition for Reconsideration which was denied by the board, and from these decisions appellant has appealed to this court. R.S. 4911, 35 U.S.C.A. § 59a.

The invention resides in what appellant alleges is the first combination of a continuously variable shotgun pattern control device with a compensator or recoil…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In re HenschellCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1937
  2. In re LaneCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1948
  3. In re MolyneauxCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1929

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Application of BisleyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1952
  2. Application of LindbergCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1952
  3. Application of Leslie E. SoderquistCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1964
  4. Application of HallCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1953
  5. Winslow Manufacturing Co. v. Peerless Gauge Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1958

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API