Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. Ray-O-Vac Co.
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Roberts
This case involves the validity and alleged infringement of the Anthony Patent No. 2,198,423, issued April 23, 1940. The District Court held the patent valid and infringed1 and its judgment was affirmed by the Circuit Court of Appeals.2
The patent, a very narrow one in a crowded art, is for a leak-proof dry cell for a flashlight battery. The conventional dry cell embodies a cup-like zinc electrode acting as a container for a central carbon electrode, electrolyte, and depolarizing mix. The bottom enclosure is the terminal for one electrode, the top enclosure for the other. The electrolyte is a…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- The Barbed Wire PatentSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Loom Co. v. HigginsSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Diamond Rubber Co. of New York v. Consolidated Rubber Tire Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Topliff v. TopliffSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Potts v. CreagerSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by250 opinions
- Graver Tank & Mfg. Co. v. Linde Air Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Cuozzo Speed Technologies, LLC v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
- Jungersen v. Ostby & Barton Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Armour & Co. v. Wilson & Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1960
- Universal Oil Products Co. v. Globe Oil & Refining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
245 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.