Legal Opinion
Application of Philip A. Shaffer, Jr
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Decided January 20, 1956No. Patent Appeal 6149PublishedCited by 46 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JOHNSON, Judge.
This is an appeal from the decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office affirming the holding of the Primary Examiner rejecting as unpatentable claims 29 through 33, the only remaining claims in appellant’s application for a patent relating to titrating apparatus.
The embodiment of the invention sought to be patented, as set forth in the claims, relates to an automatic apparatus for continuously titrating a moving stream of fluid. The apparatus basically consists of a first pair of electrodes immersed in the fluid for electrolytically generating a reagent…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Application of BisleyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1952
- In Re FridolphCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1943
- Application of LindbergCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1952
- In Re KaufmannCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1951
- In re DeLanceyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1947
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- Reeves Brothers, Inc. v. US Laminating Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 1968
- Teledyne Industries, Inc. v. Windmere Products, Inc.District Court, S.D. Florida · 1977
- In re SkollCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1975
- Application of Harvey E. Hortman, JrCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1959
- Kistler Instrumente AG v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1980
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.