Legal Opinion
Levitz v. State
Arizona Supreme Court
Decided June 5, 1980No. 14450PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HOLOHAN, Vice Chief Justice.
This appeal has been brought by the City of Phoenix from a judgment of the Superi- or Court declaring the City’s Ordinance G— 1508 invalid. The Superior Court also enjoined the City from initiating or continuing any criminal prosecutions of appellees based on the ordinance’s provisions. We assumed jurisdiction pursuant to Rule 19(e), Rules of Civil Appellate Procedure, 17A A.R.S.
Prior to December 27, 1967, the City of Phoenix regulated signs and billboards through its Zoning Ordinance. On the above date the City Council adopted Ordinance G-831 which placed the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Thomas Cusack Co. v. City of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Hart v. Bayless Investment & Trading CompanyArizona Supreme Court · 1959
- City of Scottsdale v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1968
- Luhrs v. City of PhoenixArizona Supreme Court · 1938
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Libra Group, Inc. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1991
- Schwarz v. City of GlendaleCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1997
- City of Tucson v. Whiteco Metrocom, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1999
- Gannett Outdoor Co. v. City of MesaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1989
- Motel 6 Operating Ltd. Partnership v. City of FlagstaffCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1999
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.