Luhrs v. City of Phoenix
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtRoss, J.
The appellant, as a taxpayer of the city of Phoenix, in his own behalf and in behalf of others similarly situated, brought two suits against the city of Phoenix and the members of its commission, one challenging the constitutionality of chapter 40, Laws of 1937, known as “the Police Pension Act of 1937,” and the other challenging the constitutionality of chapter 43, Laws of 1937, known as “the Police, Peace Officers’ and Firemen’s Minimum Wage Act of 1937.” G-eneral demurrers to the complaints were sustained and judgments entered for the defendants. Plaintiff appealed.
By stipulation, the…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Ewing v. HoblitzelleSupreme Court of Missouri · 1884
- State ex rel. Risch v. Board of Trustees of the Policemen's Pension FundWisconsin Supreme Court · 1904
- Van Gilder v. City of MadisonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1936
- City of Pasadena v. CharlevilleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
- State ex rel. Hawes v. MasonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1899
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by45 opinions
- Arizona Downs v. Arizona Horsemen's FoundationArizona Supreme Court · 1981
- Republic Investment Fund I v. Town of SurpriseArizona Supreme Court · 1990
- Axberg v. City of LincolnNebraska Supreme Court · 1942
- City of Tucson v. Tucson Sunshine Climate ClubArizona Supreme Court · 1945
- Marro v. CRANSTON GEN. TREASURERSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1971
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.