Schwarz v. City of Glendale
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RYAN, Judge.
Under Arizona statute, when twenty percent or more of the property owners within 150 feet of property included in a proposed zoning change protest the proposed rezoning in writing, the'proposed change cannot become effective unless approved by a super-majority, three-fourths, vote of the city council. Ariz.Rev.Stat. Ann. (“A.R.S.”) § 9-462.04(G). We must decide whether a buffer area created by the property owner seeking rezoning prevents the statute from being triggered. The trial court found that it does on the facts of this case. We agree and thus affirm.
FACTS AND…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Heaton v. City of CharlotteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
- Libra Group, Inc. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1991
- Manning v. ReillyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1965
- Levitz v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1980
- Herrington v. County of PeoriaAppellate Court of Illinois · 1973
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Residential and Agricultural Advisory Committee, LLC, an Iowa Limited Liability Company Matt Mescher Allan R. Demmer Catherine Demmer Wayne Ameskamp Sharon Ameskamp Vernon Boge Donald Boge Mary Ann Rubly John R. Rubly Dolores Thier Larry Thier Gary Burkle Cindy Burkle Wayne Vorwald Linda Vorwald Jeff Pape Gerald Wolf And Joanne Wolf v. Dyersville City Council, Mayor JameSupreme Court of Iowa · 2016
- County of La Paz v. Yakima Compost Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2010
- City of Tucson v. Whiteco Metrocom, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1999
- Rogone v. CorreiaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
- In Re Mh 2008-002659Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2010
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.