Legal Opinion

Gannett Outdoor Co. v. City of Mesa

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided January 12, 1989No. 1 CA-CIV 9928PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CONTRERAS, Presiding Judge.

In this appeal, we consider the issue of whether the replacement of an existing multi-pole billboard structure with a new mono-pole structure of the same dimensions constitutes a “reasonable alteration” of non-conforming property within the meaning of A.R.S. § 9-462.02. We conclude that such a change in the structural support system of the billboard does not constitute a “reasonable alteration” within the meaning of the statute. Accordingly, we reverse the trial court’s order requiring the City of Mesa to issue sign permits authorizing such structural change.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Mueller v. City of Phoenix Ex Rel. Phoenix Board of Adjustment IIArizona Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Phoenix City Council v. Canyon Ford, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1970
  3. Arizona Foundation for Neurology & Psychiatry v. SienerthCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1970
  4. City of Phoenix v. SUPERIOR COURT, CTY. OF MARICOPAArizona Supreme Court · 1973
  5. Levitz v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1980

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. In Re Stowe Club HighlandsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1995
  2. City of Tucson v. Clear Channel Outdoor, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
  3. City of Tempe v. Outdoor Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2001
  4. Outdoor Systems, Inc. v. City of MesaArizona Supreme Court · 1991
  5. City of Tucson v. Whiteco Metrocom, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1999

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API