Legal Opinion

Libra Group, Inc. v. State

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided January 29, 1991No. 1 CA-CV 89-477PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

EUBANK, Judge.

Libra Group, Inc., appeals from the trial court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of the State of Arizona, the director of the Arizona Department of Transportation (ADOT) and Pima County. Because we hold that A.R.S. §§ 28-2101 through 28-2110 (Arizona Highway Beautification Act or Arizona act) recognizes the concurrent authority of state and local governments to regulate outdoor advertising signs along Arizona highways, wé affirm.

I. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

According to the stipulated facts, Libra Group, Inc. (plaintiff) filed with ADOT approximately sixty-five…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. City of Mesa v. KillingsworthArizona Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Arnold v. Arizona Department of Health ServicesArizona Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Donnelly Advertising Corp. v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1977
  4. Flagstaff Vending Co. v. City of FlagstaffArizona Supreme Court · 1978
  5. National Advertising Co. v. Department of HighwaysSupreme Court of Colorado · 1988

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Evenstad v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1993
  2. Blum v. STATE, DEPT. OF CORRECTIONSCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1992
  3. Schwarz v. City of GlendaleCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1997
  4. Hampton v. Glendale Union High School DistrictCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1992
  5. Tallent v. National General InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1996

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API