Legal Opinion
Motel 6 Operating Ltd. Partnership v. City of Flagstaff
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided November 30, 1999No. 1 CA-CV 98-0678, 1 CA-CV 98-0036PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WEISBERG, Presiding Judge.
¶ 1 The City of Flagstaff (“the City”) appeals from the judgment in favor of Motel 6 Operating Limited Partnership (“Motel 6”), Circle K Stores, Inc. (“Circle K”), and Green-tree Village Partners Limited Partnership (“Greentree”) (collectively “plaintiffs”). The judgment declared unlawful the City’s refusal to allow alterations to plaintiffs’ signs. The City also appeals the award of attorneys’ fees to plaintiffs. For the reasons discussed below, we affirm.
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
¶2 Plaintiffs own separate businesses in the City, and have freestanding…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Phoenix Newspapers, Inc. v. Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1997
- Outdoor Systems, Inc. v. City of MesaArizona Supreme Court · 1991
- Gannett Outdoor Co. v. City of MesaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1989
- Rotter v. Coconino CountyArizona Supreme Court · 1991
- Levitz v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1980
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- City of Tucson v. Clear Channel Outdoor, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
- John C. Lincoln Hospital v. Maricopa CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2004
- City of Tempe v. Outdoor Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2001
- Budget Inn of Daphne, Inc. v. City of DaphneSupreme Court of Alabama · 2000
- Aegis of Arizona, L.L.C. v. Town of MaranaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2003
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.