Legal Opinion

Gibson v. Hercules Manufacturing & Sales Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 18, 1927No. Docket No. 3190PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPlummer, J.

Plaintiff began this action against the defendant corporation and its stockholders to recover damages in the sum of $100,000, consisting principally of loss of profits alleged io have been suffered by him for and on account of the failure of the defendant corporation to keep and perform on its part the terms and conditions of a certain contract annexed as an exhibit and made a part of plaintiff’s complaint. The defendants interposed demurrers, both general and special, setting forth in detail eighty-nine general and special reasons why the plaintiff’s complaint is insufficient. Five…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Central Coal & Coke Co. v. HartmanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1901
  2. McConnell v. Corona City Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1906
  3. Shoemaker v. AckerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  4. California Press Manufacturing Co. v. Stafford Packing Co.California Supreme Court · 1923
  5. C. W. Kettering Mercantile Co. v. SheppardNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1914

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Natural Soda Products Co. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Grupe v. GlickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Jegen v. BergerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
  4. Handley v. GuascoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
  5. Morello v. Growers Grape Products Assn.California Court of Appeal · 1947

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API