Legal Opinion
Handley v. Guasco
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 5, 1958No. Civ. 17828PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBray, J.
Plaintiff Handley recovered judgment against defendants for $2,175, and plaintiff Gosliner for $2,668.70. Defendants appeal.
Questions Presented
1. Sufficiency of the evidence.
2. Was estimated loss of profits recoverable?
Record
Plaintiff Handley sought specific performance and damages if it could not be had for nonperformance of an alleged lease of real property owned by defendants dated July 16, 1952. Plaintiff Gosliner sought similar relief for nonperformance of an alleged lease of a portion of the same property dated July 17.
Defendants Felice Guaseo and Teresina Guaseo were the joint owners…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Shoemaker v. AckerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Weiss v. Revenue Building & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1936
- California Press Manufacturing Co. v. Stafford Packing Co.California Supreme Court · 1923
- Pao Ch'en Lee v. GREGORICUCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
- Lacy Manufacturing Co. v. Gold Crown Mining Co.California Court of Appeal · 1942
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Foreman & Clark Corp. v. FallonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Sanchez-Corea v. Bank of AmericaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- Gerwin v. Southeastern California Ass'n of Seventh Day AdventistsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
- Berge v. International Harvester Co.California Court of Appeal · 1983
- Marshall v. MarshallCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.