Legal Opinion
Lecy v. Sage Co.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided September 11, 1990No. C2-90-633PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HAROLD W. SCHULTZ, Judge.
Audrey Lecy appeals from a summary judgment dismissing her claim against Sage Company for ordering her to “retire” from their employ in violation of Minn.Stat. § 181.81 (Supp.1987). The trial court also dismissed Lecy’s claim for age discrimination under the Minnesota Human Rights Act on statute of limitation grounds. Lecy does not appeal that decision.
FACTS
After 15 years of employment as a caretaker and resident manager of Heritage Square Apartments, Audrey Lecy was given a letter from the managing partner of Sage Company telling her that she was “retired” as…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Betlach v. Wayzata CondominiumSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- A. J. Chromy Construction Co. v. Commercial Mechanical Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Grondahl v. BulluckSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- Nordling v. Ford Motor Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
- Strand v. Special School District No. 1Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- DeRoche v. All American Bottling Corp.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1998
- Oelschlager v. MagnusonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995
- Hyland v. Metropolitan Airports CommissionCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995
- In Re Estate of RosenbergerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993
- State v. PalmerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.