State v. Palmer
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HALBROOKS, Judge.
Appellant Mark Palmer, an employee of Quick Silver Express Courier, challenges his conviction of possession of a handgun without a permit under Minn.Stat. § 624.714, subd. 1 (1998). He asserts that because his vehicle is his place of business, the exception stated in Minn.Stat. § 624.714, subd. 9(a) (1998), which allows possession of a handgun without a permit in one’s “place of business,” is applicable. Because we conclude that the exception contemplates a fixed-location business and not a vehicle, we affirm.
FACTS
Appellant is employed as a courier for Quick Silver…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State v. LothenbachSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- United States v. WatersDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1947
- State v. LinvilleCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1999
- United States v. WatersCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1948
- People v. BrooksMichigan Court of Appeals · 1978
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Sandra Castillo as Personal Representative of the Estate of Jose Luis Estrada-Martinez v. American Standard Insurance Company of WisconsinCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2017