Legal Opinion

State v. Palmer

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided December 4, 2001No. C9-01-559PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HALBROOKS, Judge.

Appellant Mark Palmer, an employee of Quick Silver Express Courier, challenges his conviction of possession of a handgun without a permit under Minn.Stat. § 624.714, subd. 1 (1998). He asserts that because his vehicle is his place of business, the exception stated in Minn.Stat. § 624.714, subd. 9(a) (1998), which allows possession of a handgun without a permit in one’s “place of business,” is applicable. Because we conclude that the exception contemplates a fixed-location business and not a vehicle, we affirm.

FACTS

Appellant is employed as a courier for Quick Silver…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. LothenbachSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  2. United States v. WatersDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1947
  3. State v. LinvilleCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1999
  4. United States v. WatersCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1948
  5. People v. BrooksMichigan Court of Appeals · 1978

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Sandra Castillo as Personal Representative of the Estate of Jose Luis Estrada-Martinez v. American Standard Insurance Company of WisconsinCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API