Legal Opinion
Hyland v. Metropolitan Airports Commission
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided October 17, 1995No. C9-95-955PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HARTEN, Judge.
Appellants sued the Metropolitan Airports Commission (MAC), challenging certain fees established pursuant to MAC Ordinance No. 79. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of MAC, ruling that the fees did not constitute an invalid tax and were not preempted by state law. We agree and affirm.
FACTS
Appellants Ronald and Gail Hyland, d/b/a G & R Transportation (G & R), own and operate a personal transportation service regulated by the State of Minnesota. 1 G & R’s personal transportation vehicles pick up passengers at the Minneapolis-St. Paul International…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Offerdahl v. University of Minnesota Hospitals & ClinicsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Alevizos v. Metropolitan Air. Com'n of Mpls. & St. P.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
- Lenz v. Coon Creek Watershed DistrictSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
- Essling v. MarkmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- Arlandson v. HumphreySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Enterprise Leasing Company, Doing Business as Enterprise Rent-A-Car, a Minnesota Corporation v. Metropolitan Airports Commission, a Public CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2001
- In Re the Welfare of the Child of L.M.L.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2007
- Enterprise Leasing Co. v. Metropolitan Airports CommissionDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2000
- Marriage of Jones v. JarvinenCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2012
- Enterprise Leasing v. Metropolitan AirportCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2001
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.