In Re Estate of Rosenberger

OPINION

NORTON, Judge.

Decedent’s widow was awarded family maintenance under Minn.Stat. § 525.15(4) (1990) from his estate which had been attached in a separate trial court action by appellant. Appellant argues that because neither the widow nor the estate could prove that the assets in the estate were the property of the estate, no family maintenance should have been paid. We affirm the probate court.

FACTS

After allegedly embezzling $147,744.01 from his employer, David Rosenberger committed suicide. Utica Mutual Insurance Company (Utica) reimbursed the employer for the loss pursuant to a…