Legal Opinion
Cal. Taxpayers Action Network v. Taber Constr., Inc.
California Court of Appeal, 5th District
Decided May 2, 2017No. A145078PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*125DISCUSSION
A. Standard of Review
"In reviewing the sufficiency of a complaint against a general demurrer, we are guided by long-settled rules. 'We treat the demurrer as admitting all material facts properly pleaded, but not contentions, deductions or conclusions of fact or law. [Citation.] We also consider matters which may be judicially noticed.' [Citation.] Further, we give the complaint a reasonable interpretation, reading it as a whole and its parts in their context. [Citation.] When a demurrer is sustained, we determine whether the complaint states facts sufficient to constitute a cause of…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Blank v. KirwanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- California Teachers Ass'n v. Governing Board of Rialto Unified School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
- Blair v. PitchessCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Horn v. County of VenturaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- Jordache Enterprises Inc. v. BrobeckCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- A.J. Fistes Corp. v. GDL Best Contractors, Inc., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- Holloway v. Showcase Realty Agents, Inc., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- San Diegans for Open Gov't v. Pub. Facilities Fin. Auth. of San Diego, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
- A.J. Fistes Corp. v. GDL Best Contractors, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2019
- Cal. Taxpayers Action Network v. Taber Construction, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2019
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.