Legal Opinion
Holloway v. Showcase Realty Agents, Inc.
California Court of Appeal, 5th District
Decided April 5, 2018No. H043492; H043704PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPremo, J.
*874*761The San Lorenzo Valley Water District (District) acquired real property in Boulder Creek, California from Gregory and Edwige Dildine (Dildines). Bruce Holloway is a taxpayer within District, and filed suit claiming the contract was void under Government Code section 1090, because one of District's directors, Terry Vierra, had an interest in the contract by nature of his partial ownership in Showcase Realty (Showcase), the agency that facilitated the property sale, and the fact that his wife was the listing agent for the property.
District and Showcase brought a successful demurrer on the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Blank v. KirwanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- Stigall v. City of TaftCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- Thomson v. CallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- Weatherford v. City of San RafaelCalifornia Supreme Court · 2017
- Terry v. BenderCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- A.J. Fistes Corp. v. GDL Best Contractors, Inc., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- A.J. Fistes Corp. v. GDL Best Contractors, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2019
- Davis v. Mariposa County Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2019
- Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Assn. v. Coachella Valley Water Dist.California Court of Appeal · 2025
- San Diegans for Open Gov. v. Public Facilities Financing etc.California Supreme Court · 2019