San Diegans for Open Gov't v. Pub. Facilities Fin. Auth. of San Diego
California Court of Appeal, 5th District
1Opinion of the CourtBenke, Acting P. J.
*1276At issue here is a municipal ordinance, which authorized the issuance of bonds to be used to refinance the defendants' obligations with respect to construction of a baseball park. We find plaintiff taxpayers have standing under Government Code 1 section 1092 to challenge the ordinance on the grounds participants in the proposed transaction violated the conflict of interest provisions of section 1090. Accordingly, we must *1277reverse the trial court's judgment dismissing plaintiff's complaint, which judgment was entered on the grounds plaintiffs do not have standing to challenge the ordinance.
FACTU…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- United States v. Mississippi Valley Generating Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Ghirardo v. AntonioliCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
- Stigall v. City of TaftCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- Thomson v. CallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- Weatherford v. City of San RafaelCalifornia Supreme Court · 2017
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Holloway v. Showcase Realty Agents, Inc., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Holloway v. Showcase Realty Agents, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2018
- San Diegans for Open Gov. v. Public Facilities Financing etc.California Supreme Court · 2019