Legal Opinion

San Diegans for Open Gov't v. Pub. Facilities Fin. Auth. of San Diego

California Court of Appeal, 5th District

Decided November 9, 2017No. D069751PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBenke, Acting P. J.

*1276At issue here is a municipal ordinance, which authorized the issuance of bonds to be used to refinance the defendants' obligations with respect to construction of a baseball park. We find plaintiff taxpayers have standing under Government Code 1 section 1092 to challenge the ordinance on the grounds participants in the proposed transaction violated the conflict of interest provisions of section 1090. Accordingly, we must *1277reverse the trial court's judgment dismissing plaintiff's complaint, which judgment was entered on the grounds plaintiffs do not have standing to challenge the ordinance.

FACTU…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. United States v. Mississippi Valley Generating Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. Ghirardo v. AntonioliCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Stigall v. City of TaftCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Thomson v. CallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Weatherford v. City of San RafaelCalifornia Supreme Court · 2017

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Holloway v. Showcase Realty Agents, Inc., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  2. Holloway v. Showcase Realty Agents, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2018
  3. San Diegans for Open Gov. v. Public Facilities Financing etc.California Supreme Court · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API