Jordache Enterprises Inc. v. Brobeck
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
CHIN, J.
In this case, we again address the meaning of “actual injury” under the legal malpractice statute of limitations, Code of Civil Procedure section 340.6.1 That statute commences the limitations period with the *743attorney’s wrongful act or omission, or with the plaintiff’s actual or constructive discovery of the attorney’s error. However, several specified circumstances toll the prescriptive period, including that “The plaintiff has not sustained actual injury . . . .” (§ 340.6, subd. (a)(1).)
This court most recently considered the actual injury provision in Adams v. Paul (1995) 11…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Montrose Chemical Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
- Jolly v. Eli Lilly & Co.California Supreme Court · 1988
- Neel v. Magana, Olney, Levy, Cathcart & GelfandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Budd v. NixenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Brandt v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by130 opinions
- Oasis West Realty v. GoldmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011
- Aryeh v. Canon Business Solutions, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2013
- Samuels v. MixCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
- Coscia v. McKenna & CuneoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
- People v. AcostaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
125 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.