Commonwealth v. Strickland Transportation Corp.
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge Menceb,
This appeal has been taken from an order of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Board) which affirmed the referee’s setting aside a final receipt and awarding compensation for partial disability to Frederick Eltonhead (claimant). The appellants here, Strickland Transportation Corporation (Strickland) and its insurance carrier, have argued that the Board’s decision was erroneous as a matter of law because it did not disapprove the referee’s refusal to consider two pieces of evidence offered by Strickland. We disagree and affirm the Board.
While working for Strickland…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Commonwealth v. BighumSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
- Commonwealth v. FutchSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- Buck v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1884
- Commonwealth v. KingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- City of Pittsburgh v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. BuffaloHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1983
- Commonwealth v. CragleSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Smith v. LefloreSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- LeDonne v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- Haines v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.