Legal Opinion

Smith v. Leflore

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 11, 1981No. 9PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BECK, Judge:

This is an appeal from the denial of a motion for a new trial in a paternity suit. In the first of two civil trials (this one without a jury), appellant was found not to be the father of appellee’s child. Subsequently, a Motion for a New Trial by appellee was granted. In a jury trial, appellant was found to be the father of that child.

Appellant raises four assignments of error by the lower court. Two of those contentions have merit:(1) Appellant was prejudiced when counsel for appellee inquired during cross-examination as to a prior arrest.(2) Appellant was prejudiced when an…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. StorySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  2. Commonwealth v. BighumSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  3. United States v. Robert Neil Conder, United States of America v. Bernard Joseph Grogan, United States of America v. William Moore PegramCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1970
  4. Commonwealth v. SpruillSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  5. Nelson v. SeilerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1927

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Estelle Jordan v. Lawrence MedleyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1983
  2. Commonwealth v. ChanceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  3. Commonwealth v. HawkinsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  4. Vetter, J. and Jones, A. v. Miller, A.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  5. Ammon v. Arnold Pontiac-GMC, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API