Smith v. Leflore
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
BECK, Judge:
This is an appeal from the denial of a motion for a new trial in a paternity suit. In the first of two civil trials (this one without a jury), appellant was found not to be the father of appellee’s child. Subsequently, a Motion for a New Trial by appellee was granted. In a jury trial, appellant was found to be the father of that child.
Appellant raises four assignments of error by the lower court. Two of those contentions have merit:(1) Appellant was prejudiced when counsel for appellee inquired during cross-examination as to a prior arrest.(2) Appellant was prejudiced when an…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Commonwealth v. StorySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Commonwealth v. BighumSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
- United States v. Robert Neil Conder, United States of America v. Bernard Joseph Grogan, United States of America v. William Moore PegramCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1970
- Commonwealth v. SpruillSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Nelson v. SeilerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1927
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Estelle Jordan v. Lawrence MedleyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1983
- Commonwealth v. ChanceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Commonwealth v. HawkinsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
- Vetter, J. and Jones, A. v. Miller, A.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
- Ammon v. Arnold Pontiac-GMC, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.