Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Cragle

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 10, 1980No. 844PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SPAETH, Judge:

This is an appeal from judgment of sentence for receiving stolen property. 1 Generally stated, the issue is whether evidence of prior criminal activity not resulting in conviction is admissible to impeach a witness. Appellant argues that the trial judge erred 1) in refusing to permit cross-examination intended to show that the witness had engaged in prior criminal activity for which he had not been convicted, and 2) in refusing to permit another witness to testify to such prior criminal activity. 2

1

During cross-examination of Commonwealth witness John Kline, defense counsel…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. BlairSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  2. Commonwealth v. BighumSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  3. People v. GreerNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
  4. Delaware Republican State Committee v. RedfearnSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Commonwealth v. KatchmerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. CheccaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  2. Commonwealth v. ShandsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  3. Commonwealth v. TilghmanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  4. Eighth North-Val, Inc. v. William L. Parkinson, D.D.S., P.C., Pension TrustSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  5. Commonwealth v. PacellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API