Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Futch

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 24, 1976No. 76PublishedCited by 51 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

EAGEN, Justice.

Appellant, Clifford Futch, was convicted by a jury of murder of the first degree for the killing of Charles Ganss and the punishment was fixed at death. Following the denial of post-verdict motions the sentence was imposed as the jury had directed. This direct appeal from the judgment of sentence followed. A new trial is required because the trial court erred in refusing to allow a question requested by the defense for the voir dire examination of prospective jurors.1

On February 26, 1975, at approximately 7:20 a. m., Charles Ganss, an inmate at the State…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Ristaino v. RossSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Commonwealth v. LopinsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
  3. Ronald R. Brown v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1964
  4. Commonwealth v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  5. Commonwealth v. McGrewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. Langley v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1977
  2. Commonwealth v. ShireySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  3. Commonwealth v. BerriganSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  4. Commonwealth v. WilsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  5. Commonwealth v. GraySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API