City of Pittsburgh v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge Rogers,
The question to be decided in this workmen’s compensation case is whether the claimant, Ma,ry Alice Sherred, is entitled to medical expenses incurred after the first 12 months of disability as provided by Section 306(f) of the Yforkmen’s Compensation Act, Act of June 2, 1915, P. L. 736, 77 P.S. 1531.1 The answer will depend on whether the further medical services applied for were such as would result in restoring the claimant’s earning power to a substantial degree.
After hearings, the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board denied the claimant’s application for further…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Sherred v. PittsburghCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
- Diaz v. Jones and Laughlin Steel Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
- Cowan v. Bunting Glider Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
- Lucas v. Walters Milling Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
- Frey v. National Bond Insulators, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Hilton Hotel Corp. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Smith v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Sledge v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Commonwealth v. Strickland Transportation Corp.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Koppers Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.