Quirk v. Quirk
District Court, S.D. California
In Equity. Suit by Florence Akeley Quirk against James Quirk and another. Plaintiff filed, under equity rule 58, interrogatories addressed to the defendants, to which they filed objections.
1Opinion of the Court
TRIPPET, District Judge.
The plaintiff filed under equity rule 58 (198 Fed. xxxiv, 115 C. C. A. xxxiv), at the time of the filing of the bill, certain interrogatories addressed to the defendants, seeking to havé the defendants discover to the plaintiff certain facts. The defendants, within proper time after the service of the interrogatories, objected to them, and each of them. These objections, briefly stated, are to the effect that the matter sought to be discovered by the interrogatories rests as much in the knowledge of the plaintiff as of the defendants, that they are inquisitorial in…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Pressed Steel Car Co. v. Union Pac. R.District Court, S.D. New York · 1917
- Wagner v. Meccano Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1917
- Batdorf v. Sattley Coin Handling Mach. Co.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1916
- Marquette Mfg. Co. v. Oglesby Coal Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1918
- General Electric Co. v. Independent Lamp & Wire Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1915
3Cited by8 opinions
- In Re Del Gobbo VinceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1949
- Perkins Oil Well Cementing Co. v. OwenDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1923
- Cobb Temperature Regulator Co. v. BairdDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1923
- Wright v. Dodge Bros.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1924
- Bartenbach v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1934
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.