Luten v. Camp
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
In Equity. Suit by Daniel B. Futen against Carl R. Camp and others for injunction to restrain infringement of a patent. On objections to plaintiff's interrogatories.
1Opinion of the Court
THOMPSON, District Judge.
The plaintiff has filed interrogatories, under Supreme Court equity rule 58 (198 Fed. xxxiv, 115 C. C. A. xxxiv), for the discovery by the defendants of facts and documents alleged to be material to the support of the cause. At the argument the defendants summarized the objections as follows:(1) The oath to the answer having been waived by the plaintiff in his bill, discovery is also waived, and the defendants are not obliged to make any answer to the interrogatories filed in support of the discovery.(2) The interrogatories involve evidence and facts tending to prove…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Union Bank of Georgetown v. GearySupreme Court of the United States · 1831
- Bronk v. Charles H. Scott Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1914
- P. M. Co. v. Ajax Rail Anchor Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1914
- Huntington v. SaundersSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Excelsior Wooden Pipe Co. v. City of SeattleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1902
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Sinclair Refining Co. v. Jenkins Petroleum Process Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Munzer v. Swedish American LineDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1940
- J. H. Day Co. v. Mountain City Mill Co.District Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1915
- F. Speidel Co. v. N. Barstow Co.District Court, D. Rhode Island · 1916
- Universal Oil Products Co. v. Skelly Oil Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1926
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.