Legal Opinion

John Wood Mfg. Co. v. Keiner-Williams Stamping Co.

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided February 11, 1925PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GARYIN, District Judge.

This is a motion to compel the defendant to answer interrogatories in behalf of plaintiff. The interrogatories to which real objection is made are numbered 5 and 6, and read as follows:

“(5) If the answer to any of the foregoing interrogatories is affirmative, please describe the method or process of making each container contemplated in such answer.
“(6) Please produce specimens of, or detailed illustrations showing, the construction of all forms of sheet metal containers of the type ordinarily used as milk or ice cream containers, manufactured for sale, or sold by…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. A. B. Dick Co. v. Underwood Typewriter Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1916
  2. Marquette Mfg. Co. v. Oglesby Coal Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1918
  3. McLeod Tire Corp. v. B. F. Goodrich Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1920
  4. Window Glass Mach. Co. v. Brookville Glass & Tile Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1916
  5. Federal Manufacturing & Printing Co. v. International Bank Note Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1902

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Lever Bros. Co. v. Proctor & Gamble Mfg. Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 1941
  2. Claude Neon Lights, Inc. v. E. Machlett & SonDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1926
  3. United States Gypsum Co. v. Pacific Portland Cement Co.District Court, S.D. California · 1927
  4. B. B. Chemical Co. v. Cataract Chemical Co.District Court, W.D. New York · 1938
  5. Steinfur Patents Corp. v. Moos Fur Dyeing Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 1931

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API