Prince Line, Ltd. v. Mayer & Lage, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
In Admiralty. Suit in which the Prince Pine, Limited, filed a cross-libel against Mayer & Lage, Incorporated. On motion to require security, and on exceptions to interrogatories. Motion denied, and exceptions overruled.
1Opinion of the Court
LEARNED HAND, District Judge.
The points presented are respectively these: Shall the cross-re.spondent be required, on motion under the fifty-third rule (29 Sup. Ct. xiv) to give security on the cross-libel? Shall the exceptions be sustained to the interrogatories propounded in the answer to the libel ?
[1] The libelant is a domestic corporation, and filed a libel in per-sonam against the respondent, a foreign corporation, without attachment. Later the cross-libel was filed in personam, and the cross-libelant moves now for security under the fifty-third rule. Obviously, had the cross-libel been…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Marquette Mfg. Co. v. Oglesby Coal Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1918
- Franklin Sugar-Refining Co. v. FunchDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1895
3Cited by11 opinions
- Washington-Southern Navigation Co. v. Baltimore & Philadelphia Steamboat Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- The S. S. HewittDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1922
- American Far Eastern Syndicate, Inc. v. The Raphael SemmesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1942
- MacLeod & Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1924
- In re Navigazione Libera TriestinaDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1929
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.