A. B. Dick Co. v. Underwood Typewriter Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
In Equity. Suits by the A. B. Dick Company against the Underwood Typewriter Company. On objections to interrogatories and motions for bills of particulars.
1Opinion of the Court
MAYER, District Judge.
There are two cases, both the usual patent infringement suits. The main case is based upon four patents relating to the art of stencil duplication. Two of these patents cover the so-called “Dermatype” stencil sheet, while the other two cover, respectively, methods of preparing and using stencil sheets. The second case is based upon a patent relating to a moistening solution for use on a stencil sheet such as covered by the patents in the main case.
Case No. 1 (Involving Four Patents)—Interrogatories.
There are in all 56 claims and 87 interrogatories. The answer, after…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- De Laski & Thropp Circular Woven Tire Co. v. United States Tire Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1916
- Oriental Tissue Co. v. Louis Dejonge & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1914
- Oriental Tissue Co. v. Louis De Jonge & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1916
- De Laski & Thropp Circular Woven Tire Co. v. United States Tire Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1915
3Cited by32 opinions
- Grasselli Chemical Co. v. National Aniline & Chemical Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1920
- Universal Oil Products Co. v. Skelly Oil Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1926
- National Nut Co. of California v. Kelling Nut Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1945
- Babcock & Wilcox Co. v. North Carolina Pulp Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1938
- Ginsberg v. Railway Express Agency, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1945
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.