Legal Opinion

State v. Reynolds

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided January 7, 1992No. CR-91-0116-PRPublishedCited by 55 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GORDON, Chief Justice.

The State of Arizona petitioned for review of the court of appeals’ opinion holding that a defendant is entitled to credit for time spent in a drug rehabilitation program as time spent “in custody” pursuant to A.R.S. § 13-709(B). We granted review to resolve a conflict between court of appeals’ decisions on this issue. We have jurisdiction pursuant to Ariz. Const, art. 6, § 5(3), and A.R.S. § 12-120.24.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

Brian Reynolds (appellant)' pleaded guilty to attempted sale of narcotic drugs. The trial court placed him on five years probation.…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Janson v. ChristensenArizona Supreme Court · 1991
  2. State v. KorzepArizona Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Mid Kansas Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n of Wichita v. Dynamic Development Corp.Arizona Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Lock v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1980
  5. People v. RodgersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by55 opinions

  1. Hayes v. Continental InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1994
  2. State v. RiggsArizona Supreme Court · 1997
  3. State v. MilkeArizona Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Beecroft v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1994
  5. State v. CidCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1995

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API