State v. Reynolds
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GORDON, Chief Justice.
The State of Arizona petitioned for review of the court of appeals’ opinion holding that a defendant is entitled to credit for time spent in a drug rehabilitation program as time spent “in custody” pursuant to A.R.S. § 13-709(B). We granted review to resolve a conflict between court of appeals’ decisions on this issue. We have jurisdiction pursuant to Ariz. Const, art. 6, § 5(3), and A.R.S. § 12-120.24.
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
Brian Reynolds (appellant)' pleaded guilty to attempted sale of narcotic drugs. The trial court placed him on five years probation.…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Janson v. ChristensenArizona Supreme Court · 1991
- State v. KorzepArizona Supreme Court · 1990
- Mid Kansas Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n of Wichita v. Dynamic Development Corp.Arizona Supreme Court · 1991
- Lock v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1980
- People v. RodgersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by55 opinions
- Hayes v. Continental InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. RiggsArizona Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. MilkeArizona Supreme Court · 1993
- Beecroft v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1994
- State v. CidCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1995
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.