State ex rel. Industrial Commission v. Word
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HURWITZ, Vice Chief Justice.
¶ 1 This case requires us to interpret AR.S. § 23-907(E) (Supp.2009), which governs recovery of payments made by the Industrial Commission to injured workers whose employers fail to maintain workers’ compensation insurance.
*354I.
A
¶ 2 On August 2, 1991, Robert Ruehrmund was injured while employed by Tommy Word. Because Word did not carry workers’ compensation insurance, Ruehrmund had the option of either pursuing tort remedies or seeking benefits from the Commission’s Special Fund. AR.S. § 23-907(A)-(B) (Supp. 1990). The Special Fund is financed by assessments…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State v. Superior Court for Maricopa CountyArizona Supreme Court · 1976
- Obregon v. Industrial Commission of ArizonaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
- Grammatico v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 2005
- Word v. Industrial Com'n of ArizonaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1993
- Pflum v. PflumCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1982
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- STATE EX REL. INDUS. COM'N v. WordArizona Supreme Court · 2010