Legal Opinion

Dow v. Noble

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1986No. 14660, 14670PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MORGAN, Justice.

This is an action for foreclosure of a real estate contract under the provisions of SDCL ch. 21-50. The trial court entered judgment for the vendor, Charles Dow (Dow), and against vendees Gerald and Janet Noble (Nobles), cancelling and annulling the contract unless Nobles paid Dow the sum of $297,000 plus interest and attorney-fees to be taxed by the court, costs to be taxed by the clerk. The judgment provided in the alternative for Dow to pay to Nobles $10,600 to finalize the judgment. Nobles appeal and Dow filed a notice of review. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Staab v. CameronSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Cook v. RezekSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Prentice v. ClassenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Roseberg v. SteenCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
  5. Freehling v. MGIC Financial Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Mattson v. RachettoSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Beitelspacher v. WintherSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Chamberlain Livestock Auction, Inc. v. PennerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Wandler v. LewisSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Wolken v. BunnSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API