Legal Opinion

Prentice v. Classen

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided September 26, 1984No. 14369PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WOLLMAN, Justice.

This is an appeal by Opal Classen from a judgment decreeing that she was in default on a contract for deed. We affirm.

On May 1, 1980, Lowell and Mary Prentice agreed to sell Opal and Charles Clas-sen some fifty-six acres of pasture land, together with the house, garage, and outbuildings situated on the land. The contract for deed entered into by the parties fixed the purchase price at $45,000.00 and provided that the Classens would pay $4,500.00 at or before the execution of the contract, $6,174.00 on November 1, 1980, and $3,321.15 on November 1, 1981, and a like sum each…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Dave Gustafson & Co. v. StateSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Hofer v. WM Scott Livestock CompanyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Anderson v. Cactus Heights Country ClubSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Walter Motor Truck Co. v. State Ex Rel. Department of TransportationSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1980

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Beitelspacher v. WintherSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Chamberlain Livestock Auction, Inc. v. PennerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Heikkila v. CarverSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Dow v. NobleSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Wandler v. LewisSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API