Legal Opinion
Roseberg v. Steen
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided February 19, 1985No. C5-84-1024PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LANSING, Judge.
Don and Dorothy Steen appeal from the trial court’s order terminating an escrow account and ordering the proceeds paid to respondent Arthur Roseberg. The escrow account resulted from a replevin action by Roseberg for possession of the Steens’ 1983 PIK (payment in kind) wheat allotment. The grain was sold by agreement of the parties and the proceeds placed in escrow. We reverse and remand.
FACTS
Respondent Arthur Roseberg loaned Donald and Dorothy Steen $30,000 on April 27, 1983. In exchange the Steens gave Roseberg a PIK assignment and power of attorney. The PIK assignment…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Borg-Warner Acceptance Corporation v. Alvin Dewayne Hall and Beverly Jane Hall, A/K/A Beverly Jane CantinCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1982
- Ellis v. Minneapolis Commission on Civil RightsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- Hauser v. MealeySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
- Victory Highway Village, Inc. v. WeaverDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1979
- Paul Rhodes v. Dwain L. JonesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1965
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Matter of Trusts Created by HormelCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993
- Dow v. NobleSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
- North Tel, Inc. v. Brandl (In Re Brandl)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota · 1995
- Application of HofstadCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
- Falk v. Hecker (In Re Falk)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota · 1988
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.