Beitelspacher v. Winther
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
HENDERSON, Justice.
CASE SUMMARY
We affirm the trial court’s decision on a contract for deed foreclosure, with the exception of a double counting of improvements made by the Buyers which wrongly skews the balancing of equities. Thus, we affirm in part and reverse and remand in part.
PROCEDURAL HISTORY/ISSUES
Plaintiffs/appellants Reuben 0. Beitel-spacher and Ruth Beitelspacher (Sellers) initiated an action to foreclose on a 1977 contract for deed in the circuit court for Brown County after defendants/appellees Elden L. Winther and Antoinette Winther (Buyers) failed to make a final $123,585…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Freedman v. Rector, Wardens & Vestrymen of St. Matthias ParishCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- Walz v. City of HudsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1982
- Moran v. HolmanAlaska Supreme Court · 1972
- Corbly v. MathesonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983
- State v. HeisingerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1977
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Steinberg v. South Dakota Department of Military & Veterans AffairsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
- Farmland Insurance Companies of Des Moines v. HeitmannSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
- Mattson v. RachettoSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
- Nelson v. School Board of the Hill City School District No. 51-2South Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
- Rumpza v. Donalar Enterprises, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.