Legal Opinion

Beitelspacher v. Winther

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided October 18, 1989No. 16388, 16389PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HENDERSON, Justice.

CASE SUMMARY

We affirm the trial court’s decision on a contract for deed foreclosure, with the exception of a double counting of improvements made by the Buyers which wrongly skews the balancing of equities. Thus, we affirm in part and reverse and remand in part.

PROCEDURAL HISTORY/ISSUES

Plaintiffs/appellants Reuben 0. Beitel-spacher and Ruth Beitelspacher (Sellers) initiated an action to foreclose on a 1977 contract for deed in the circuit court for Brown County after defendants/appellees Elden L. Winther and Antoinette Winther (Buyers) failed to make a final $123,585…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Freedman v. Rector, Wardens & Vestrymen of St. Matthias ParishCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Walz v. City of HudsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Moran v. HolmanAlaska Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Corbly v. MathesonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983
  5. State v. HeisingerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1977

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Steinberg v. South Dakota Department of Military & Veterans AffairsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Farmland Insurance Companies of Des Moines v. HeitmannSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Mattson v. RachettoSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Nelson v. School Board of the Hill City School District No. 51-2South Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Rumpza v. Donalar Enterprises, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1998

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API