Legal Opinion
Wolken v. Bunn
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided April 20, 1988No. 15713PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HENDERSON, Justice.
ACTION/PROCEDURAL HISTORY
Fred A. Wolken and Carol L. Wolken (Sellers) brought an action against Paul C. Bunn (Buyer) requesting foreclosure and a deficiency judgment for the remaining bal-anee due after Buyer refused to make further payments under a contract for deed. The trial court so ordered. Buyer made a motion for relief from the judgment, which was denied by the trial court. He now appeals both the trial court’s judgment and the denial of his motion for relief, asserting trial court error in three regards: (1) A deficiency judgment was inappropriate; (2) Sellers…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Arcon Construction Co. v. South Dakota Cement PlantSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
- Hepper v. Triple U Enterprises, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
- First Bank of South Dakota v. Haberer Dairy & Farm Equipment, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
- Dow v. NobleSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
- Miners & Merchants Bank v. Braden Forestry Services, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- City of Sioux Falls v. KelleySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
- Chamberlain Livestock Auction, Inc. v. PennerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
- Wandler v. LewisSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
- Jade, Inc. v. BendewaldSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
- In re BunkeUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. South Dakota · 1994
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.