Legal Opinion

Staab v. Cameron

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided July 18, 1984No. 14435PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DUNN, Justice.

This is an appeal from a summary judgment granted to the defendant in an attorney malpractice action. We affirm.

The facts involved in this case have been before us on three separate occasions: Staab v. Skoglund, 89 S.D. 470, 234 N.W.2d 45 (1975) (Staab I); Skoglund v. Staab, 269 N.W.2d 401 (S.D.1978) (Staab II); and Skoglund v. Staab, 312 N.W.2d 29 (1981) (Staab III). Since the first of those opinions details the facts at great length, we will not duplicate them all here; we will focus only on the most important events.

Verenna Staab was the owner of a quarter section of land in…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Wilson v. Great Northern Railway CompanySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Black Hills Jewelry Manufacturing Co. v. Felco Jewel Industries, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Owens v. City of BeresfordSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Melbourn v. BenhamSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Taylor Oil Co. v. WeisenseeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Landstrom v. ShaverSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Behrens v. WedmoreSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Weiss v. Van NormanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Moe v. MoeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Grand State Property, Inc. v. Woods, Fuller, Shultz, & Smith, P.C.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1996

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API