Legal Opinion

Grasgreen v. Acme Auto Parks

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 4, 1958No. Civ. 23000PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NOURSE, J. pro tem. *

Plaintiff appeals from a judgment entered in favor of defendants on the verdict of the jury.

The facts in this case, as disclosed by the evidence, are: The defendant, Acme Auto Parks, operates an automobile parking lot on South Spring Street in the city of Los Angeles. The defendant Thomas is an employee of Acme. The entrance to the parking lot in question is on the east side of Spring Street. It is bordered on the east and south by an office building. The parking area is approximately 54 feet in width north to south and approximately 100 feet in depth. On the north side…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Butigan v. Yellow Cab Co.California Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Vaughn v. JonasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Parker v. WomackCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Jentick v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Barlin v. BarlinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Cordell v. ScottSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Alvarado v. AndersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  3. Marc Bellaire, Inc. v. FleischmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  4. Hoyt v. Los Angeles Metropolitan Transit AuthorityCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
  5. Yockel v. HatleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API